MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7055518372

Convective heat transfer in hemispherical cavities with planar inner surfaces

2011· article· en· W7055518372 on OpenAlexaffvenue

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeat transferNusselt numberConvective heat transferConvectionPlanarNatural convectionLaminar flowAirflow
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Domed cavities are found in many applications in buildings, particularly in conventional skylights and tubular daylighting devices. Heat transfer through domed cavities is thus an important factor in evaluating the energy performance rating of such skylight systems, and in calculating the heating and cooling loads of buildings. Although there have been many studies on the convective heat transfer in related geometries, there is very limited information on natural convective heat transfer in domed cavities with planar inner surfaces. In this paper, a numerical study is conducted on natural laminar convective heat transfer in horizontal domed cavities with planar inner surfaces. The bounding surfaces are subject to uniform temperature conditions. The numerical model is based on the finite element method. The model predictions are successfully compared with published data in literature for concentric spheres and hemispherical cavities. The results show that for different boundary temperature conditions, the airflow in the cavities is mono-cellular and reaches steady state conditions for both cold and hot weather conditions. The numerical results are used to develop practical correlations for the Nusselt number.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.371
Threshold uncertainty score0.763

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2370.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARCSame topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207