MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7055565832

Constitution and by-laws of the Celtic Society of Montreal, organised Dec. 6th, 1883 : inaugural address of the president : list of members, etc.

2014· article· en· W7055565832 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCeltic languagesHonourConstitutionGermanVenerationContradiction
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

My regret, however, is great and sincere, that you did not select some one to fill the honourable office which I now hold, who has a wider and more thorough knowledge of the Celtic languages than I can pretend to have, and who has more leisure for attending to the various requirements of a youthful Society like ours ; inasmuch as, even with large zeal and enthu- siasm on the part of members of our Society, constant vigilance and earnest diligence are needed to impart permanent strength and usefulness to our Society.We have a large and an intelli- gent constituency, however ) and, such being the case, we can in all fairness hope, that our Society, which is still in its infancy, will go on to gather strength, until it reaches the years, and gathers the usefulness, of a courageous and vigorous manhood.Those whose hearts are warmed with Celtic blood have at least the satisfaction of knowing, that they are the descendants of perhaps the oldest race in Europe.Although the earliest appearance of the Celts on that Continent is enveloped in hope- less obscurity, it is true beyond contradiction that our Celtic forefathers were both numerous and powerful, and had the hoar and honour of centuries on their side, before the English or German or French or Italian peoples had any distinctive existence.Pride of extraction and veneration for genealogies that reach back

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.878
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)Same topicAtomic and Subatomic Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207