MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7055608441

Control and Learning for Robotic Excavation

2021· dissertation· en· W7055608441 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2021
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLaser Design and Applications
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExcavatorExcavationRobustness (evolution)RobotActuatorControl systemRobotic armHomogeneousBase (topology)Control (management)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite a large body of research and engineering work in robotic excavation, spanning decades, commercially viable systems for fully autonomous excavation are still in their infancy. The challenge is that performance is strongly influenced by the conditions of interaction between the excavator and the material, which are typically unknown and changing throughout an excavation process. For example, material such as fragmented rock, is not homogeneous in size and composition, can be wet and sticky, or dry, depending on local factors, and it inherently moves and exposes new hidden material that is not visible prior to executing the excavation process. Thus, a fully autonomous solution for robotic excavation requires adaptation to these changing conditions in order to achieve consistent bucket filling performance. The robotic excavation research presented in this thesis focuses on the development and study of control and learning approaches for autonomous loading of fragmented rock using robotic load-haul-dump (LHD) machines, which are utilized in underground mining; although, the developed approaches are applicable to surface loaders as well. Using an admittance-based dig control strategy for autonomous loading---which uses force feedback to regulate motion commands to a loader's bucket actuator for autonomous digging and loading---as a base control framework, preliminary field experiments are conducted with a 14-tonne capacity robotic LHD machine to gain insights into the science of the autonomous loading process. These insights are used to improve the overall dig controller design, which increases the controller's robustness and facilitates consistent bucket filling performance. This robust and consistent base control framework enables the use of simple learning algorithms to adapt the controller to changing material characteristics. An iterative learning algorithm is developed and validated, which adapts control parameters to track a desired bucket fill weight at each excavation pass. A material classification methodology is also developed and validated, which uses information in the controller's force feedback signal to classify excavation materials to further improve learning and adaptation. Compared to AI-based approaches that require many training samples and advanced computing, the developed control and learning approaches have practical significance as demonstrated through the full-scale field experiments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.172
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)Same topicLaser Design and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207