MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7055655397

Characterization of a novel endogenous steroid, estradienolone (ED), in human pregnancy

2003· dissertation· en· W7055655397 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2003
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Frequency and Time Standards
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReceptorXenobioticHormonePregnancySteroid hormoneLigand (biochemistry)EndogenyPlasma protein binding
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Estradienolone (ED, 17beta-hydroxy-[1,5]-estradien-3-one) is a novel steroid hormone identified in pregnant women. It is an isomer of estradiol which binds the progesterone receptor and sex hormone binding globulin with high affinity. Since levels of ED remain high throughout pregnancy and decrease in association with term or preterm labour, ED may be involved in the maintenance of pregnancy. The objectives of the present study were to, (i) purify ED from pregnancy samples in quantities sufficient for chemical analysis to confirm its structural features, and (ii) identify its binding proteins and receptors. Our results show that ED binds the novel methyltrienolone (R1881) binding protein of JEG-3 cells with higher affinity than any other natural steroids tested. Furthermore, ED is able to inhibit transcriptional activity of the estrogen-receptor-related receptors alpha and gamma, suggesting that ED may be the natural ligand of these orphan receptors. ED is also able to activate the xenobiotic receptor SXR. Chemical analysis of the fine structural features of purified ED is in progress.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicAdvanced Frequency and Time StandardsFrench-language works237,207