Data from: Wing morphology of a new Cretaceous praying mantis solves the phylogenetic jigsaw of early-diverging extant lineages
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This data supports the description of a new Cretaceous mantodean discovered in the Redmond Formation, a sedimentary unit of estimated Cenomanian age located in Labrador, near Schefferville, Canada. Appendix 1. RTI files of the type specimens. Holotype MPEP1157.6: complete specimen view; paratype MPEP702.11: complete view of part (MPEP702.11a), complete view of counterpart (MPEP702.11b), closeup of plicatum (MPEP702.11b). Instructions for downloading the RTI files are provided in a .rtf file. Appendix 2. Supplementary files for phylogenetic analysis. Appendix 2.1 provides coding, references and consistency, retention and homoplasy indices for the characters used to form the character matrix. Appendix 2.2 presents the character matrix in nexus format. Appendix 2.3: Fig. S1 presents the main results of various measures of branch support to assess the sensitivity of our strict consensus tree to the parsimony analysis. Appendix 3. Supplementary text. Appendix 3.1 is an extended description of the type specimens with added information on characters which were not relevant to the parsimony analysis and a discussion on the assignment of both fossil specimens to the same species. Appendix 3.2 discusses the role of fossil and extant taxa selected in the phylogenetic dataset to polarize certain morphological characters and thus resolve our strict consensus tree.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.199 | 0.073 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".