The development of a nurse practitioner-led sexual health clinic on Prince Edward Island
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Youth on Prince Edward Island (PEI) are at risk for the development of sexual health concerns. They are prone to high risk behaviours such as binge drinking, increased numbers of sexual\npartners, and unsafe sexual practices (Leonard, Chevalier, Dias, Levasseuer, & Ratcliffe, 2012).\nOn PEI the rates of chlamydia, syphilis, and hepatitis C have been on the rise since 2006\n(Department of Health and Wellness, 2014). Sexual health education is provided by the schools\nbut does not meet the needs of the students in areas of healthy relationships, gender, culture, or\nyouth with disabilities (Schalet et al., 2014). A Nurse Practitioner (NP)-led primary care\ncollaborative rights-based sexual health clinic developed with input of youth, community members, and relevant stakeholders will provide an innovative, cost-effective, and multidisciplinary approach based on best-practice and patient-centred care for the youth of PEI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".