A double-edged sword: chivalric violence in Arthurian literature
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Focusing on chivalry as an ideology, this study examines the ideas that influence behaviour in chivalric society. Specifically, it explores representations of chivalric violence in two seminal works of Arthurian literature. Sir Thomas Malory’s fifteenth-century romance, Le Morte Darthur, illustrates prowess’s centrality to chivalry through a shift in chivalric culture in which prowess defines chivalric value both before and after the shift. Initially, Balin proves unable to distinguish between brutality and justice, two opposing modes of chivalric violence. Yet, due to his prowess, Balin is still portrayed as Arthur’s greatest knight, demonstrating that chivalry needs to change. Balin’s tale depicts the transition away from a conception of chivalry in which power equates to moral rightness towards one in which power is used to protect moral rightness. Malory’s Lancelot then reveals that even after this shift prowess remains chivalry’s defining virtue and power still dictates morality. Chivalry’s violence is not therefore diminished by this transition but redirected towards the maintenance of control. Predicating its authority on displays of force, chivalry generates intracommunal violence, causing internal conflict and division. Thus this latter form of chivalry perpetuates the very violence it claims to suppress. Marion Zimmer Bradley’s twentieth-century novel, The Mists of Avalon, demonstrates chivalry’s influence on Gwenhwyfar as she is denied access to prowess and violence. Without access to prowess, Gwenhwyfar identifies with her roles as daughter, wife, housekeeper, and potential mother, all of which enable the men around her to pursue their violence. Ultimately, chivalry forces those with access to prowess into continuous violence in order to maintain its authority; meanwhile, those without access to prowess are forced into social roles that enable the perpetuation of violence. Consequently, Arthur’s chivalric community inevitably self-destructs, regardless of the rendition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.034 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".