MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7055826600

Developing a radar-based machine learning snowfall retrieval algorithm

2022· dissertation· en· W7055826600 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2022
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicParticle accelerators and beam dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRandom forestSnowRobustness (evolution)OutlierRadarPrecipitationFlood mythErrors-in-variables models
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As global temperatures continue to rise, snowfall patterns are expected to respond in a complex, nonlinear manner. Changes in the quantity of snowmelt-derived freshwater will impact global water-energy budgets, flood frequencies and intensities, and regional water resource management practices. Remote sensing is an observational alternative to poorly constrained reanalysis-derived estimates of snow water equivalent (SWE) across Arctic regions. We present an outlier detection methodology which leverages remote sensing data from CloudSat to constrain reanalysis product estimates of SWE. This analysis highlights areas and periods of high uncertainty in the gridded reanalysis datasets, and identifies a systematic positive SWE bias (of 14.9%) in a blended reanalysis product as a consequence of these low-quality estimates. The ability to use remotely sensed observations to characterize error in surface SWE estimates is incredibly powerful, however, remote sensing datasets are not without their own sources of uncertainty. This work also, therefore, examines the capabilities of a machine learning snowfall retrieval algorithm trained on vertically pointing surface radar data at a Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) validation experiment site in southern Ontario. Random forest (RF) retrieval performance is compared to an ensemble of traditional Ze-S power law relationships, with the RF consistently displaying the lowest overall error. The RF also demonstrates a level of robustness not present in the power law relations, with low error when applied to unseen observations from a study site with a different regional climate. We further extend this methodology to a general machine learning precipitation retrieval across the wider northern hemisphere (NH) using additional input covariates, data from multiple sites over a longer time period, and by adopting a more sophisticated deep learning paradigm. The DeepPrecip retrieval algorithm displays a 187% improvement in snowfall retrieval accuracy when compared to traditional Ze-S/R power law relationships, and a 21% improvement over the aforementioned RF. The highly generalized nature of DeepPrecip facilitates its application to unseen data with only a small performance reduction. DeepPrecip also provides insight into the regions of the vertical column (below 1 km and between 1.5−2 km) most effective in contributing to high retrieval accuracy, highlighting the important role of ML in current and future spaceborne remote sensing precipitation missions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)Same topicParticle accelerators and beam dynamicsFrench-language works237,207