Des formes pour vivre l’environnement : théorie, expérience, esthétique et critique politique Forms for living the environment: theory, experience, aethetics and political criticism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La question environnementale est aujourd'hui centrale aussi bien dans les discours politiques, que les travaux scientifiques et le vécu ordinaire. Malgré la diversité des approches selon les acteurs, les échelles, les situations..., les politiques publiques l'abordent avec une volonté de maîtrise, en mettant l'accent sur des dimensions gestionnaires. À partir des formes environnementales (la Terre, nature writing, le paysage, le jardin urbain, etc.), il s'agit de proposer d'autres connaissances, d'autres modes d'évaluation et d'action. Et de rapprocher les réflexions sur culture et environnement, tout en respectant les diversités présentes en chacune d'elle. La volonté de ce colloque est de faire dialoguer, par le truchement des formes, la multiplicité des discours et des acteurs et de chercher à cerner où se situe la coproduction environnementale ordinaire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.036 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.013 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".