MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7055861602

Diseño de habitaciones de un eco-hotel en el municipio de Nariño Antioquia a partir de la estrategia: acondicionamiento térmico

2016· dissertation· en· W7055861602 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2016
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicParticle accelerators and beam dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVentilation (architecture)Air conditioningThermal comfortEnergy consumptionThermalAir temperature
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper addresses the feasibility of designing a room eco-hotel in of Nariño Antioquia, from a strategy called passive thermal conditioning Canadians wells. \nThis system is burying pipelines with a certain length at a depth established in order to achieve thermal stability of the soil. Air currents entering inside the tube vary in their temperature such that the air that enters the system will match the temperature with the soil, this system helps to get better an environment, avoiding the use of mechanical conditioning systems, reducing the energy consumption of a building. \nThe performance and efficiency of this technique was comparing and combining it with the strategy of cross ventilation from models made with brick as a building material, compared to another one produced in Poron. \nThe air temperature was identified before and after entering through the heat exchangers, in addition to evaluating the temperature inside the models just with had cross ventilation and cross ventilation with Canadian wells, taking the most efficient results as a strategy for designing an eco-hotel in Antioquia-Nariño.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.157
Threshold uncertainty score0.313

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)Same topicParticle accelerators and beam dynamicsFrench-language works237,207