MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7055910543

De aquel cemento estos lodos. Vivienda, desahucios y okupación en la crisis española

2015· article· es· W7055910543 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2015
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEngineering
TopicLaser Design and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDepartment for International DevelopmentInternational Development Research Centre
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Social economyConsecrationOrder (exchange)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La cuestión de la vivienda es un eje narrativo fundamental para entender las diferentes dimensiones de la crisis en España. En primer lugar, representa, dentro del más amplio sector de la construcción, la pieza central de un modelo económico hiperespeculativo condenado a derrumbarse. En segundo lugar, la cuestión de los desahucios se ha convertido en uno de los aspectos más visibles de la crisis social. Por último, provoca un movimiento social que juega un papel fundamental dentro de la crisis de representación política. El presente texto articula estas dimensiones del problema en el contexto de la crisis española, haciendo énfasis en la profundidad histórica de los factores que dan lugar a la misma y en la relevancia de los movimientos sociales en la coyuntura actual. Se propone que la falta de respuesta institucional a la problemática y demandas sociales responde, en parte, a la ausencia de una crítica del modelo de producción del hábitat fraguado desde la segunda mitad del siglo XX. Para respaldar este argumento, el texto hace un seguimiento del movimiento contra los desahucios en Andalucía, complementado con referencias a otras regiones del Estado.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.010
Scholarly communication0.0060.006
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)Same topicLaser Design and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207