Documents written in Greek in State Archives of Chernihiv Region: proveniences, dating, paleographic and linguistic features, contents
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of the work is to study the documents of fond 101 (Nizhyn Greek Mag istrate) in the State Archives of the Chernihiv Region, identified in the inventory 1 as cases in Greek language, as well as Greek documents according to inventory 2. Methodology. Descriptive, comparative-historical, statistical methods of processing archival documents are used, as well as a number of special source studies, linguistics, and paleographic methods of researching ancient texts. Scientific novelty. For the first time, an archaeographic and historical overview of all Greek documents is presented as a result of a thorough research and description of the materials. Conclusions. Documents in inventory 1 came directly from the archives of the Nizhyn Greek Magistrate, but also contain parts of the archives of the “Lengaro and Kipuro” company, which arrived from St. Petersburg in the first quarter of the 19th century. During the formation of the fond in the second half of the 20th century, hun dreds of different documents were artificially combined on linguistic grounds within 109 cases. In 1962, materials from the archives of Dimitry Melas arrived from Kharkiv, which made up seven storage units according to a separate inventory. The total number of isolated and researched documents in 117 cases of the archive amounted to 849, of which about 750 were written in Greek, including several epis tolaries, which contain thousands of copies of commercial letters. Chronological boundaries of Greek documents 1679-1866. According to typology, among Greek documents, deed documents in the composition of court cases, original business and private correspondence, debt obligations, bills, messages, etc. prevail. A number of files contain administrative, accounting, and business books of various organizations. The considered documents allow for a more complete reconstruction of the activities of the Nizhyn Greeks, the Greek diaspora, as well as individual Greek trad ing companies of the 18th-19th centuries, which operated within the wide Eurasian space.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".