Direito aéreo : responsabilidade civil do transportador aéreo em caso de atraso e overbooking
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O setor aéreo comercial encontra-se em franca expansão, com novidades tecnológicas e novas rotas, a par da segurança e celeridade, a fomentarem a escolha deste meio de transporte pelos consumidores. O Direito tem um papel primordial para o controlo do mercado da aviação aérea, competindo-lhe resolver todas as questões relacionadas com o dito transporte e com o contrato de transporte. Nessa medida, os Estados ratificaram a Convenção de Varsóvia e, posteriormente, a Convenção de Montreal a fim de regular a responsabilidade do transportador aéreo e, consequentemente, proteger os interesses dos passageiros. A nível comunitário, a União Europeia criou o Regulamento (CE) n.º 261/2004 do Parlamento Europeu e do Conselho de 11 de fevereiro de 2004 com enfoque para a assistência e direitos dos passageiros. A combinação destes instrumentos é a fórmula para a concretização da responsabilização civil do transportador aéreo quando incumprido o contrato de transporte. Serão estes os diplomas a base do presente estudo para a análise do regime de responsabilidade civil do transportador aéreo em caso de recusa de embarque e de atraso dos voos.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".