'Don't Wait for Boldt': Building Co-management from the Ground Up: the Success of Salmon Fishermen's Groups in Western Alaska
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
From Page 1: \n \n"Co-management or cooperative management have been frequent buzzwords on the Alaskan wildlife management scene and in the Alaksa Native community for several years now. The concept is described in conferences and literature of Alaska Native and rural advocacy groups and typically the same models are presented as the standard approach to achieving more power and influence for Native villages and organizations (Rural Alaska Community Action Program 1995; Native American Fish & Wildlife Society 1998). Three major models are usually presented: the 'marine mammal commission' model exemplified by the Alaska Eskimo Whaling Commission; the 'goose plan' model demonstrated by the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta Goose Management Plan and the more recent 'tribal village self-determination and traditional knowledge' model, advocated by various individual and regional tribal groups."
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it