An Ecofeminist Analysis of In Vitro Fertilization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ecofeminist theory states that the oppression of women and the oppression of other-than-human Nature stem from the same patriarchal and hierarchical ideologies that legitimate all relationships of domination between humans, and between humans and their environment. The dualistic presuppositions of such ideologies imply an additional dualism between God and Creation. However, these dualisms are overcome by Christ’s Incarnation which extends divine salvation to all Creation and inaugurates God’s reign of peace and justice for all. In vitro fertilization makes a particularly good case study for ecofeminist theology since women and other-than-human Creation are sometimes harmed by IVF in a way that compromises their health and promotes divisive hierarchical dualisms. I contend that these harms reflect a devaluation of physical Creation, which is contrary to Christ’s inclusive Incarnation and impedes the actualization of God’s reign here on Earth. Thus, IVF is not a morally acceptable solution to infertility.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".