MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7056023017

The diet and influence of the spionid polychaete Marenzelleria on
\nbenthic communities in coastal Newfoundland

2015· dissertation· en· W7056023017 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University) · 2015
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNucleofectionTSG101Gestational periodHyporeflexiaDiafiltrationFusible alloyLiquation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spionid polychaetes within the genus Marenzelleria are common inhabitants of \norganically enriched sediments in the Northern hemisphere. The species M. viridis has \nunique ventilation behaviors that create dynamic, fluctuating oxygen conditions in \nsediments, enhancing sulfate reduction. These behaviours may have negative effects on \nother macrofauna and positive effects on sulfur bacteria. A Marenzelleria species recently \nsampled in Newfoundland is here identified as M. viridis, and its abundance correlates \nlittle with abiotic factors and macrofaunal community composition at examined sites. \nVarious types of surrounding sediments (oxic and suboxic as well as M. viridis burrow \nlinings) contained surprisingly similar total prokaryotic, sulfate reducing and sulfur \noxidizing bacteria numbers. The high abundance of sedimentary prokaryotes, combined \nwith the stable isotopic composition of M. viridis tissues and lack of obvious symbionts, \nsuggest that, thanks to its ventilation behaviour, this species may “farm” sulfur bacteria in \nsediments and use them as a primary food source.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.635
Threshold uncertainty score0.725

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University)Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207