MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7056109371

Developmental and functional analysis of the mouse submaxillary gland protein (mSMGP)

2001· other· en· W7056109371 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2001
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSubmandibular glandNorthern blotGene expressionGeneSubmaxillary glandSalivary glandEmbryogenesisIn situ hybridizationWestern blot
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mouse submaxillary gland protein (mSMGP) gene is highly expressed in the submandibular and lacrimal glands of the adult mouse. As a first step in elucidating the role of the mSMGP in the submandibular gland, gene expression in the developing mouse was examined. Using reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), Southern and Northern blot analyses, mSMGP gene expression in the prenatal submandibular gland was det cted as early as embryonic day 14 (E14), the approximate time at which submandibular gland development begins. By 'in situ' hybridization studies of the embryonic gland, mSMGP gene expression was localized to the acinar cells, the major secretory cells of the submandibular gland. The early and continued expression of the mSMGP gene in the embryo suggests that the mSMGP may be integral during submandibular gland development in the mouse. Sequence analysis of the mSMGP in our laboratory has revealed the presence of a signal peptide, suggesting that the mSMGP is a secreted protein. (Abstract shortened by UMI.)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)→Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→