A economia social em perspectiva transversal no Brasil e no Canadá.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A mobilização dos cidadãos no desenvolvimento da economia social tem representado o surgimento de novas estratégias de organização nas sociedades brasileira e canadense. Dentro desse quadro, as cooperativas têm se mostrado como políticas sociais duplo-ganhadoras (win-win), em que a grande oportunidade a ser aproveitada pela consolidação da economia social como componente essencial de uma sociedade cada vez mais responsável e participativa está na raiz de uma estratégia conjunta de articulação de ganhos trazidos à questão do trabalho e ao desenvolvimento local. Com essa discussão são fornecidos os subsídios para a garantia de pluralidade e o aprofundamento do debate sobre economia social.Abstract: The mobilization of citizens for the development of social economics has represented the urge of new organizational strategies in the Brazilian and in the Canadian societies. Inside this framework, cooperatives have been considered double-winner social policies (win-win), while a great opportunity to be undertaken for the consolidation of social economy as an essential component of a society more and more responsible is the root of a team articulation of earnings brought to the employment question and to the local development. This discussion supplies assistance to assure plurality and depth for the debate about social economy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.015 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".