Energy Efficiency and Flexibility Analysis for Building-Integrated Photovoltaics-Heat Pump Combinations in a House
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis considers three design configurations of air source heat pumps and building-integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) systems in a solar house concerning energy efficiency and energy flexibility in interacting with a smart grid. BIPV/Thermal (BIPV/T) provides electricity generation and reduces the electricity consumption when pre-heating air for a heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) system such as a heat pump. A heat pump’s coefficient of performance (COP) and capacity decrease at colder temperatures. Therefore, increasing the inlet temperature can significantly increase the capacity or enable a heat pump to operate when the outdoor air is below the cut-off temperature. A higher COP enables an efficient heat transfer and storage when heat is available; this provides flexibility to the system. Energy flexibility is an important factor to consider as providing flexibility to the grid helps alleviate its demand and stress during critical periods. In addition to the grid’s need, the utility often provides incentives for consumers to reduce electricity consumption during critical periods. Adopting advanced controls that can provide flexibility is beneficial to help reduce overall electricity consumption and energy cost. \nA comprehensive literature review of various BIPV systems and their applications demonstrated a gap in the current research to investigate the possibility of utilizing solar gain (from inside a solarium or greenhouse) to pre-heating air for a heat pump. Furthermore, the use of semi-transparent photovoltaic (STPV) windows with a heat pump have not been explored. Thus, a new configuration is proposed utilizing the solar heated air in an attached solarium as a source for the air side of an air-source heat pump water heater (HPWH) with integrated water thermal storage and a 5kW semi-transparent photovoltaic façade. This configuration is compared with two other cases: a reference case consists of a 5kW BIPV system on the roof with a separate HPWH and a more novel option of a 5kW BIPV/T roof system. The heated air from the BIPV/T system is ducted to the air source of the HPWH, which also contains integrated thermal storage (the hot water). The three cases are modelled with an explicit finite difference thermal network model, and energy performance is determined and compared over a typical heating season in Montreal. \nAnother important gap in the research found from the literature review is maximizing the flexibility of BIPV/T and heat pump systems. Thus, the energy flexibility of the BIPV/T configurations listed previously is compared for different scenarios, such as heating the thermal water storage during the daytime (e.g., using the solar heat in the novel options) and using it for space heating during the time that the grid is under stress (and may have price incentives). \nA full-scale experimental set-up modelling the passive solar case was completed to demonstrate this novel system configuration and to partially verify the developed model using the Future Buildings Laboratory at Concordia University. The real-time data collected from the experiment is analyzed and utilized to verify each component within the system. Results show that the proposed case utilizing the solarium air as the inlet of the heat pump had over 80% reduction in annual electricity consumption relative to the reference. In comparison, the BIPV/T configuration had around a 5% reduction compared to the reference case. The proposed configuration improves system performance significantly compared to the reference and ducted BIPV/T systems. The tank volume and solarium size had the highest impact on the system's energy flexibility. Optimal thermal storage size was between 300 – 600 L for a house with a floor area of 116 m2. The experimental results confirmed the increased energy savings from the passive solar configuration operation. The temperature in the test rooms reached over 20 °C on a cold sunny day from passive solar gains. The simulation models had a similar performance to the experimental data which also demonstrated the significant energy flexibility potential of the configuration tested.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".