MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7056225104

Double-Spin Asymmetry in the Cross Section for Exclusive tho(0) production in Lepton Proton Scattering.

2001· article· en· W7056225104 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLaser Design and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceDeutsches Elektronen-SynchrotronNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Science FoundationToray Science FoundationDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftIstituto Nazionale di Fisica NucleareVlaamse regeringFonds Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungU.S. Department of EnergyMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyDeutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst
KeywordsCross section (physics)LeptonAsymmetryProduction (economics)Proton
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Evidence for a positive longitudinal double-spin asymmetry A ρ 1 = 0.24 ± 0.11 stat ± 0.02 syst in the cross section for exclusive diffractive ρ 0 (770) vector-meson production in polarised lepton-proton scattering was observed by the HERMES experiment.The longitudinally polarised 27.56 GeV HERA positron beam was scattered off a longitudinally polarised pure hydrogen gas target.The average invariant mass of the photon-proton system has a value of W = 4.9 GeV, while the average negative squared four-momentum of the virtual photon is Q 2 = 1.7 GeV 2 .The ratio of the present result to the corresponding spin asymmetry in inclusive deep-inelastic scattering is in agreement with an early theoretical prediction based on the generalised vector-meson dominance model. 2001

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueDigital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)Same topicLaser Design and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207