El francés, lengua de\ncomunicación internacional
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Actualmente la mundialización ha propiciado intercambios y progresos en todo el planeta, día con día, y con la \nconstrucción de bloques comunes, como el caso de la Comunidad Europea, los poderes públicos han sido llamados a \nconcebir una política lingüística, a garantizar la prioridad de las lenguas y su aprendizaje. En el caso del francés, esta \nlengua sigue siendo partícipe de un esfuerzo de cohesión nacional en Francia y en Québec, y contribuye a la diversidad \ncultural en Europa, en África y en el mundo entero. \nEn este contexto, en el presente artículo se reflexiona sobre la importancia del francés como lengua de \ncomunicación internacional que está presente en los cinco continentes y cuyo proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje está \ninscrito en una perspectiva de diversificación lingüística y en una didáctica del plurilingüismo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".