El efecto de la libre movilidad de capitales sobre el crecimiento económico en los países miembro de la Alianza del Pacífico, durante 2000- 2019
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research work focuses on the liberalization of capital in the case of the member countries of the Pacific Alliance. This regional integration was formally constituted in 2012 and is made up of Chile, Colombia, Mexico and Peru, among its objectives is to achieve greater development and economic growth, in order to generate greater well-being for its citizens, eradicating the different socioeconomic inequalities existing in the countries. To achieve this, they propose four axes (free movement of goods, services, capital and people). It is important to focus the analysis on the aforementioned group of countries due to the prestige they are having, given that it has observers from countries such as Australia, Canada, Ecuador, Spain, the United States, France, Japan, and China. In addition, the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) as a whole covers more than 35% of the total of Latin America, and they are recipients, on average, around 60 million dollars of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".