En el teatro, quiero palpar la atención del público
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gustavo Lizarraga es alumno del Colegio de Literatura Dramática y Teatro y en esta ocasión realizó una entrevista para el Metate al profesor José Luis Ibañez, quien es profesor de tiempo completo de dicho colegio. Se ha dedicado profesionalmente a la traducción y dirección de obras dramáticas y ha sido director de una larga serie de recitales de poesía mexicana y española. \nDurante la conversación Gustavo le hace preguntas a José Luis referentes a la importancia que tiene el espacio dentro del teatro para el y su relación con los griegos; sobre los isabelinos y la época de Oro. “Aunque debo aclarar que nunca he dirigido una obra griega y poco recuerdo de las que he presenciado como espectador. Siempre les agradezco a los trágicos su claridad. Nos dicen sin demora en dónde está situada la acción, entre quiénes se está presentando y con cuáles problemas nos vemos confrontados” reflexiona en la primer pregunta Ibañez.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.039 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".