MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7056406009

The epidemiology of treatment-resistant depression in Manitoba: a retrospective cohort study using administrative health data

2019· dissertation· en· W7056406009 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2019
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpidemiologyDepression (economics)Retrospective cohort studyMajor depressive disorderMental healthHazard ratioProportional hazards modelPopulationCohort study
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a condition that is difficult to treat, as many individuals do not experience complete remission, and many eventually relapse. Individuals who do not respond to antidepressant therapy are defined as having treatment-resistant depression (TRD). The epidemiology of TRD has been studied using commercial insurance claims data in the United States, but no such studies exist for a general population or in Canada. This thesis describes the epidemiology of TRD in Manitoba between 1996 and 2016 and compares the risks for ambulatory visits, emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations, and all-cause mortality for individuals with TRD to those with non-treatment-resistant MDD. I used the Anderson-Gill generalization of the extended Cox proportional hazards model to analyze these risks. TRD was defined using the Massachusetts General Hospital Staging Method (MGH-s), where scores of 2.5 and higher correspond to TRD. I identified 169,511 adults living in Manitoba between 1996 and 2016 who were diagnosed with MDD and dispensed at least six weeks of antidepressants from the Manitoba Population Research Data Repository at the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy. By 2016, 18,663 individuals (11.0% of the cohort) met the criteria for TRD. Compared to MGH-s scores of 1, the hazard ratios (HR) for mental health related ED visits for MGH-2.5 and MGH-3 were 3.9 and 5.6 , respectively. The HR for hospitalizations with a primary diagnosis of MDD were 4.9 and 8.3 for MGH-2.5 and MGH-3, respectively. For individuals 10 years below the average age of the cohort, TRD was associated with a three-fold increased risk for all-cause mortality. For individuals 10 years above the average age of the cohort, TRD was associated with a two-fold increased risk for all-cause mortality. These findings show that TRD is an important risk factor for requiring more intensive medical care for mood and anxiety disorders. Increasing hazards associated with increases in MGH-s scores support the hypothesis that TRD follows a severity continuum. As the risk for all-cause mortality was higher for individuals with TRD, further research is needed to determine whether TRD is associated with a higher risk for suicide.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.799
Threshold uncertainty score0.405

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.006
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)→Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→