Feminist Collections v.30, no.2 (spring 2009)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
FROM THE EDITORS: Feminist networking in Wisconsin. FEMINIST VISIONS: Women's documentary films, by Marilyn Gottschalk. SERIALS TRENDS: LITERATURE FOR WOMEN IN THE POST-MS. ERA: By Valerie Berk, reprinted from Ulrich's News. FEMINIST PUBLISHING: Several new presses; US. distributors for non-US. publishers; and two literary festivals. NEW REFERENCE WORKS IN WOMEN'S STUDIES: New sources on Simone de Beauvoir, pianist Cecile Chaminade, the history of women's magazines, women composers, George Eliot, Margaret Drabble, Denise Levertov, curriculum integration, women's symbols and sacred objects, abortion, and Anne Morrow Lindbergh. PERIODICAL NOTES: New periodicals on domestic violence, coaching women's basketball, media images of women, medical women, women of color, Australian anthropologist Olive Pink, poetry by women of the south central U.S., and rural women around the world. Special issues on Sylvia Plath, women and crime, gender roles in the family, gender and the economy, Georgia O'Keefe and other women artists, education, and housing. Transitions: Upfront resumes publication. Ceased publication: Feminist Writers Guild Newsletter; Aegis Magazine on Ending Violence Against Women. ITEMS OF NOTE: A bibliographic database from UNESCO; a statistical database from the U.N.; public interest reports from a Wisconsin charity; teaching units on women and development; classroom activities for promoting sex equity; a lesbian-gay mail-order bookstore; reprints of two classic feminist titles; a Spanish version of This Bridge Called My Back; a lesbian-feminist book distributor; a study guide on Latina films and videos. WOMEN'S STUDIES IN WISCONSIN: WHO'S WHO & WHERE. BOOK REVIEWS: Eyeing the Nineties: Recent Writings in Art History, by Nancy Ring. Theatrical Disruptions, by Margaret Swanson. Professional Tools for a Women's Profession, by Susan Searing. BOOKS RECENTLY RECEIVED.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.237 | 0.096 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".