The Fox Hotel, 1 and 1a Market Place, Chipping Norton, Oxfordshire: Tree-ring analysis and radiocarbon wiggle-matching of oak timbers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tree-ring analysis was undertaken on the ring-width series from fourteen of the fifteen timbers sampled from The Fox Hotel and the neighbouring building to the east, 1 and 1A Market Place. Cross-matching allowed three site master chronologies to be formed, two from the Fox Hotel, and one from 1 and 1A Market Place, which contained three, two, and three timbers respectively. Neither Fox Hotel chronologies could be dated by dendrochronology. The moulded beams in 1 and 1A Market Place, however, were converted from trees most likely felled in the second quarter of the fifteenth century AD. Radiocarbon dating was undertaken on eight single-ring samples from cnfox05, the longest tree-ring series in the undated site sequence cnfox542m. Wiggle-matching of these results, taking account of the missing sapwood rings on the samples, indicates that the three cross-matched coeval timbers from the roof of the Fox Hotel were felled in the last quarter of the sixteenth century AD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".