The Effects of Client Centered Occupational Therapy on Particıpation to Daily Living Activities in Schizophrenics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: This study was planned to determine the difficulties in daily living activities and participation of schizophrenics and the effects of client centered activity based occupational therapy interventions. Material and Methods: Nine schizophrenics according to DSM-V-TR from Dışkapı Community Mental Health Center were participated in the study. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) was used for determining of activity performance problems and World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHO DAS II) was used for assessing the participation to daily living activities. Results: It is determined that bathing is the most difficult activity for schizophrenics according to COPM. The significant improvement of individuals’ activity performance, performance satisfaction and participation were found (p<,05). Discussion: Client-centered and activity based occupational therapy interventions are increased the independency and participation of the schizophrenics. It was implied that this study will contribute the increasing of schizophrenics’ participation in rehabilitation process with client centered and activity based occupational therapy interventions
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".