Bibliographic record
Abstract
GECEKONDU DÖNÜŞÜMÜ PENDİK ÖRNEĞİ \n\nBüyükşehirlere göçle birlikte oluşan hızlı kentleşme süreci, çarpık yapılaşma ve gecekondu olgusunu da modern şehircilik çerçevesinde bir sorun olarak beraberinde getirmiştir. Gerek merkezi yönetim ve gerekse de yerel yönetimler bu sorunun giderilmesi için, modern şehircilik anlayışının yanı sıra sosyolojik gerçekleri de göz önünde bulundurarak bazı çalışmalar yapmaktadırlar. Bunlardan birisi de gecekondu dönüşümünün sağlanmasına yönelik çabalardır.\n \t Bu çalışmada, Pendik gecekondu dönüşüm uygulamaları incelenerek, vatandaşın demografik yapısı, gecekondu dönüşümüne bakışı, yaşadıkları mahalleden memnuniyetleri, dönüşüm uygulamasının sonrası gelişme ve değişimler araştırılmıştır. Araştırma verilerinin elde edilmesinde Gecekondu Dönüşüm Uygulamaları hakkında bir anket uygulanmıştır. Vatandaşların dönüşüm algısı, dönüşüme verdiği destek ve beklentilerin hangi boyutta karşılandığı t-testi ve tek yönlü varyans analizi (ANOVA), uygulama, destek ve beklentiler arasındaki ilişkiyi bulmaya yönelik ise Pearson Çarpım Moment Korelâsyon Analizi tekniği kullanılmıştır. \nAraştırma ile elde edilen veriler üzerinde yapılan çalışmanın sonucunda, vatandaşların yaşadıkları mahalleden memnun oldukları, dönüşüm uygulamalarından memnuniyetleri ile beklentilerin karşılanması arasında anlamlı bir ilişki olduğu bulunmuştur.\nABSTRACT\n\nPENDİK MODEL OF SLUM TRANSFORMATION\nThe quick urbanization period formed along with the move to the metropolitans, has brought the deformed structuring and slum fact as a problem within the modern urbanization frame. The centrally administration as well as the local administration are doing some works by taking into consideration the social realities besides the modern urbanization concept. One of them is the efforts directed to provide the slum transformation.\nOn this study by examining the application of Pendik slum transformation, the demographic structure of the people, their look at the slum transformation, their satisfaction from the quarter where they live, the developments and modifications after transformation application have been examined. On optaining the data of the examination a survey has been applied about the Slum Transformation Applications.\nThe transformation perception of the people, the support that they give to the transformation and t-test of on which size the expectations have been supported and one way analysis of variance (ANOVA), if it is directed to find the relation between the applications, supports and expectations, then the technique of Pearson Multiplication Moment Corelation Analysis has been used.\nOn the result of the study made on the data obtained by the research it has been found that the people are happy with the quarter where they live, that there is a meaningful relation between their satisfaction of transformation applications and meeting their expectations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.024 | 0.021 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.252 | 0.076 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".