MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7056477869

Extending the analysis and synthesis approach to classes of nonlinear systems

2011· dissertation· en· W7056477869 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2011
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicThermal properties of materials
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcGill University
KeywordsNonlinear systemHarmonicsNonlinear system identificationNonlinear distortionControl theory (sociology)System identificationSIGNAL (programming language)Simple (philosophy)Linear system
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis investigates the properties of an analysis and re-synthesis methodof a class of nonlinear systems, with an application to audio effects for guitar. Thegoal of this work is to develop a straightforward method to characterize certaintypes of nonlinear systems (the analysis), and subsequently use this characterizationto create a generic structure for the model of the system. The model imitatesthe nonlinear system's behaviour such that the output of the model to a giveninput signal is the same as the output of the actual nonlinear system under study(the synthesis). A method for system identification of linear systems is first presented,and then the method is extended to analyze nonlinear systems as well.An in-depth presentation of how the method works is presented. The informationextracted by the analysis is then used as parameters in a synthesis modelto emulate a particular nonlinear system under study. The analysis/synthesismethod is then tested on some simple memoryless nonlinear systems with simpleinputs. Finally, three ‘real-world' nonlinear systems are then used to validate theanalysis/synthesis method developed in this work. The nonlinear systems areall distortion effects intended for electric guitar. Outputs of the model agreedwell with the actual system output when the input was a simple sinusoid. Themodel's performance did however suffer when a wide-bandwidth musical signal wasused as input. Outputs were lacking in higher harmonic content and overall gain.This is thought to be due to the limited bandwidth of the chirp used as well as alimitation on the number of harmonics that can be modeled.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicThermal properties of materialsFrench-language works237,207