MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7056503403

Enhancing characterization of water use practices in cement manufacturing and related construction sectors

2014· dissertation· en· W7056503403 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Atrium (University of Guelph) · 2014
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicParticle accelerators and beam dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCementReliability (semiconductor)Work (physics)Water useData collectionWater–cement ratio
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work presents an investigation into water use patterns for cement manufacturing, ready-mixed concrete production, and buildings under construction and after occupation. Cement is the main component in making concrete, which is the most widely used structural building material in the world, and therefore plays an important role in global water use in the construction sector. The data collection methodology included review of refereed journals, analysis of published Corporate Social Responsibility Reports from worldwide cement companies, as well as case studies conducted in two cement plants (one in Brazil and one in Canada), thus incorporating real-world operating conditions. Analysis of water usage at ready-mixed concrete plants and buildings under construction and after occupation was also undertaken in Brazil. Water use at the two cement plants ranged from 250 to 2,000 litres per tonne of cement (compared to reported 147 to 3,500 L/tonne), indicating a wide range in water use patterns. Eleven stages of water use were identified for cement manufacturing, but accurate water use data could not be obtained for all these stages. Identifying and implementing water saving opportunities in cement manufacturing was hampered by a lack of reliable water use data. To address this, an approach was developed for categorizing levels of data reliability according to methods of data acquisition, and this approach was used to characterize the reliability of data compiled during this research. Reliability for the collected data in this study was then characterized to be between A+ to C-. The proposed data reliability approach can help improve data collection, reporting and decision-making around water conservation, both locally within manufacturing facilities and on jobsites, and at the level of governmental policy. This work therefore contributes to the field of water management by (a) shedding light on the lack of water usage data availability and reliability in the globally important sectors of cement manufacturing, concrete production, and buildings under construction and after occupation; (b) proposing an approach for improving the reliability of water usage data; (c) suggesting steps to improve knowledge of water usage in various sectors of construction industry; and (d) promoting best water management practices in this field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.991
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0060.006
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Atrium (University of Guelph)Same topicParticle accelerators and beam dynamicsFrench-language works237,207