MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7056520370

Elites y poder colonial: comerciantes y Cabildo en Cartagena de Indias, 1750-1810

2020· article· en· W7056520370 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBiblioteca Digital Universidad de Cartagena · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicParticle accelerators and beam dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Power (physics)Relation (database)Economic power
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article analyzes the relation between the big merchants and the Cabildo of Cartagena during the years between 1750 and 1810. To answer this question we took into account the analysis of the archival information that allowed us to recognize that it was based on last quarter of the 18th century when merchants showed a growing interest in controlling the Cabildo and in creating institutions of power (Consulate of Commerce) to defend their interests and take better advantage of the economic opportunities that the city began to offer (growth in the number of inhabitants; strengthening of the economy, thanks to the money invested in the defensive systems of the city, since the commercial policies of the crown improved the opportunities for commercial traffic).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.257
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiblioteca Digital Universidad de CartagenaSame topicParticle accelerators and beam dynamicsFrench-language works237,207