MétaCan
← all works

Factors facilitating and constraining source water protection in the Okanagan Valley, British Columbia: A political ecology perspective

2007· dissertation· en· 0 citations· W7056531197 on OpenAlex

Why is this work in the frame?

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

About CanadaIts subject is Canada, wherever its authors sit.

No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame — the usual design — would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

The three-model screen

all 1,000 screened works →

All three models called this out of scope.

stratum: about_only · design weight: 3321.24 (the sample is stratified; any rate computed without the weight is wrong)
Claude Opus 4.8OUT
genre: empirical
about Canada: no
confidence: high

Political-ecology study of source-water protection in the Okanagan; environmental governance, not research governance.

GPT-5.6 (high)OUT
genre: empirical
about Canada: no
confidence: high

This studies political and institutional factors in water protection, not the research system.

Grok 4.5OUT
genre: empirical
about Canada: no
confidence: high

Political ecology of source-water protection in BC; water governance, not research or science studies.

Abstract

This research explores factors that facilitate and constrain source water protection. The theoretical approach of this research borrows from political ecology, a field of study gaining prominence in First World research that pays close attention to how relations of power operate between and among different actors to impact environmental conditions. The research findings are based on four local case studies from the Okanagan Valley, British Columbia. The methodological approach for this research draws upon qualitative and quantitative data derived from semi-structured interviews and document analysis. Forty-two interviews were conducted with a wide range of participants throughout the Okanagan Valley and the provincial capital, Victoria, between August 2004 and August 2005. Additionally, over fifty documents from multiple sources was examined. The research reveals that factors facilitating source protection tend to concentrate at the local scale. Facilitating factors include formation of multi-purveyor joint water committees, relationship building between and among different watershed user groups, broad-based education and dissemination of watershed information to ratepayers, and the appointment of water purveyor staff to assist in coordination of watershed activities. Factors constraining source protection tend to concentrate at the provincial scale and include lack of jurisdictional capacity within community watersheds as well as fragmented roles and responsibility of senior agencies around watershed management generally and source protection specifically. De-regulation and re-regulation tendencies of government respecting broader provincial policy have been contradictory to specific safe drinking water policies adding to confusion among water purveyors and water resources professionals. In addition, evidence points to provincial inter-agency rivalry that operates to constrain source protection efforts. At both the local and provincial scale there appears to be an incomplete understanding of the meaning of source protection and the multi-barrier approach. Attention to power relations based on a research perspective from political ecology helped to reveal that local water purveyors within the Okanagan Valley remain limited in their capacity and frustrated in their efforts to advance source protection.

Stored with the screening record, where it is evidence for the labels above.

The record

Venue
The Atrium (University of Guelph)
Topic
Laser Design and Applications
Field
Engineering
Canadian institutions
Funders
Keywords
Government (linguistics)WatershedPerspective (graphical)RivalryPoliticsConfusionField researchQualitative research
Has abstract in OpenAlex
yes