Forest Remote Sensing in Canada and the Individual Tree Crown (ITC) Approach to Forest Inventories
Bibliographic record
Abstract
After a brief description of Canada’s forest situation and the role of the federal government in forestry, some Natural Resources Canada’country-wide project will be introduced. These include the National Forest Inventories (past and present), the National Forest Information System, the EOSD programs to map land cover, monitor change and evaluate biomass, mostly from Canada-wide coverages with Landsat images. The accounting of carbon and the monitoring of deforestation at a map scale level will also be introduced. The second and most significant part of this paper will describe our Individual Tree Crown (ITC) approach to forest inventories used with high spatial resolution images (better than 1m/pixel). Techniques for individual crown delineation, species classification and regrouping into forest stands that are leading to a semi-automatic production of forest inventories will be described.A locally adaptive technique for tree counts, mostly reserved for young regenerating areas, will also be presented. The synergy of multispectral and LIDAR data (atmany levels) will be examined and, the normalization of spectral values within and among aerial images will be considered.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.012 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".