Extrémisme(s) et radicalité(s) violente(s) de droite au Québec et dans l’espace francophone : regards croisés Right wing extremism and violent radicalism in Quebec and the French-speaking territory - comparative approaches
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les radicalités violentes et l’extrémisme revêtent une pluralité de racines idéologiques et de visions du monde. Traditionnellement classés par la littérature scientifique sous la forme d’une typologie, les extrémismes se caractérisent par des motifs, des cadres idéationnels ou encore des généalogies communes. Parmi ces grandes familles, les radicalités violentes et les extrémismes de droite se distinguent par le peu d’intérêt qui leur est accordé à la fois comme objets scientifiques et comme objets d’action publique. Ce colloque a pour objectif d’être une plateforme d’échange pour proposer des pistes de réflexion et des éclairages autour de ce sujet méconnu du grand public et encore trop peu abordé dans la littérature scientifique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".