Front View of a Fine Suit of Armor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Of bright steel, for a man of Falstaffian proportions, this superb war harness, undoubtedly of German origin, and probably the work of Koloman Colman, bearing as it does a close resemblance to the suit of armour at Vienna made by that celebrated armourer in 1508 for the Count von Sonnenberg. This suit consists of an armet, the cheek pieces are divided down the centre of the chin, thus enabling it to close round the gorget, globose breast-plate, to which is attached the tace of four-lames and tuilles, back-plate with garde-de-rein. The defences for the arms are equipped with a pasee-garde to each of the pauldrons, the pauldron for the right shoulder being reduced for the couchment of the lance. The jambieres are fashioned with pronounced lisieres d'arrets to the cuisses, knee cops with large wing protectors, jambs and broad-toed sollerets. The entire suit is free from decoration except for the etched bands upon the gorget in the form of a chain of oval links, and immediately below the lisiere d'arret of the breast-plate the inscription "I.H.S. MARIA.." and is a splendid example illustrating the evolution from the simplified Gothic type of the last quarter of the 15th century to the more robust type of Maximilian armour, and is unrestored and complete except for the gauntlets, which are those associated with fluted Maximilian armour. Formerly exhibited at the Victoria and Albert Museum Provenance: Purchased by William Randolph Hearst from Morgan S. Williams Sale, Christie, Manson & Woods, April 26, 1921 through Duveen Brothers, Inc., London, England, May 23, 1921 for $19,675.24; sold to Gimbel Bros., Inc., January 30, 1944 for $5,000.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.702 | 0.383 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".