MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7056734645

Gender According to World Athletics: The Regulation of Racialized Athletes from the Global South

2024· article· en· W7056734645 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDalhousie law journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAthletesPrivilege (computing)Power (physics)CivilizationGender relationsGlobal South
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In March 2023, World Athletics, the regulating body for the sport of Athletics introduced The Eligibility Regulations for the Female Classification (Athletes with Differences of Sex Development). These Regulations limit participation in female Athletics events at international competition and to set world records. They require certain athletes to maintain a testosterone threshold below 2.5nmol/L, despite their naturally occurring testosterone levels. On one level, this paper is about gender regulation in sport, particularly regulating testosterone in elite, female athletes. On another level it is about power and privilege at the intersection of race, nationality, and gender. It argues that through its gender regulations, World Athletics is racializing non-western bodies and asserting white, Global North civilization as the appropriate authority on, and representation of, gender in sport. En mars 2023, World Athletics, l’organisme de réglementation du sport de l’athlétisme, a introduit les règlements d’admissibilité pour la classification féminine (athlètes ayant une différence de développement sexuel). Ces règlements limitent la participation des femmes aux épreuves d’athlétisme lors des compétitions internationales et à l’établissement de records du monde. Elles imposent à certaines athlètes de maintenir un seuil de testostérone inférieur à 2,5nmol/L, en dépit de leur taux de testostérone naturel. D’une part, le présent article traite de la régulation du genre dans le sport, en particulier de la régulation de la testostérone chez les athlètes féminines d’élite. D’autre part, il traite du pouvoir et des privilèges à l’intersection de la race, de la nationalité et du sexe. Il soutient qu’à travers ses réglementations en matière de genre, World Athletics racialise les corps non occidentaux et affirme que la civilisation blanche du Nord est l’autorité appropriée en matière de genre dans le sport et de représentation de ce dernier.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.009
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDalhousie law journalSame topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207