1905. gada revolūcija latviešu romānos: vainas apziņas diskurss
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pētījums “1905. gada revolūcija latviešu romānos: vainas apziņas diskurss” ir mēģinājums skaidrot vainas apziņas reprezentāciju 1905. gada revolūciju attēlojušajos latviešu romānos. Pētījumā ir skatīti 6 latviešu romāni: Arveda Švābes “Inteliģenti” (1912), Kārļa Zariņa “Dzīvība un trīs nāves” (1921), Andreja Upīša “Ziemeļa vējš” (1921), Andrieva Niedras “Anna Gaigala” (1927), Roberta Sēļa “Tanī bargā dienā” (1963) un Alberta Bela “Saucēja balss” (1973). Pētījumā tiek īsumā raksturota 1905. gada revolūcija un tās mijiedarbe ar latviešu literatūru, klasificētas un raksturotas romānos esošās zīmes – telpas, laika un varoņu veikto funkciju aspektā, kā arī analizēts romānu varoņu psiholoģiskais stāvoklis 1905. gada revolūcijas laikā. Pētījumā tiek noskaidroti iemesli, kāpēc romānu varoņi vairumā gadījumu nejūt vainu par revolūcijā pastrādāto.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.028 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".