MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7056760567

Examining unmet healthcare needs by immigration status among Canadian adults

2019· dissertation· en· W7056760567 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2019
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmigrationResidenceHealth carePopulationService (business)Needs assessmentHealthcare service
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Immigrants have 18% lower risk of reporting unmet healthcare needs compared to non-immigrants which can be explained by the “healthy immigrant effect”, whereby the health of immigrants is better at the time of arrival and gradually deteriorates and converges with the Canadian-born population. People with high unmet healthcare needs are higher utilizers of health services. There was no information on how (and if) unmet healthcare needs predict health service utilization and its impact on life satisfaction among immigrant populations and if the relationship varies by length of stay in Canada. The study objectives were to: 1) estimate and compare reported unmet healthcare needs by immigration status. 2) estimate and compare reasons for reported unmet healthcare needs by immigration status; 3) examine relationship between unmet healthcare needs and health service utilization by immigration status. 4) examine relationship between unmet healthcare needs and life satisfaction by immigration status. 5) determine if there is a significant association between health service utilization and life satisfaction by immigration status, controlling for unmet healthcare needs. This was a secondary analysis of cross-sectional data from the Canadian Community Health Survey, cycle 2014 master data file. Individuals who were 18 years of age and older at the time of survey were included and divided into three groups based upon their years of residence in Canada: 1) recent immigrants (≤ 5 years); 2) Long-term immigrants (>5 years); and 3) Canadian-born population. Results indicated that Canadian-born population reported a significantly higher proportion of unmet healthcare needs followed by recent-immigrants and long-term immigrants. “Cost” was the most commonly reported reason for unmet healthcare need among recent immigrants and third most common among long-term immigrants and non-immigrants. Individuals with unmet healthcare needs were more likely to use physician services and reported low life satisfaction after adjusting for demographics and health-related characteristics. Individuals who used dental services were less likely to report unmet healthcare needs and low life satisfaction after adjusting for demographics and health-related characteristics. This study focuses on challenges accessing health services, especially, by immigrant population and has the potential to inform policy implications to address barriers accounting for health inequity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.100

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)→Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→