[2020-10-20] Halo: The Master Chief Collection (PC): Halo 4 PC Test Flight
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Originally uploaded to YouTube: 2020-10-20 Includes original video sources! Description: #HaloMCC Update: LOL, copyright claimed. Whatever... "Requiem" Neil Davidge 8;53 - 10;14 WMG, SME On behalf of: 7Hz Productions Video cannot be monetized Ad revenue paid to copyright owner - - - - "Haven" Neil Davidge 47;04 - 47;32 WMG, SME On behalf of: 7Hz Productions Video cannot be monetized Ad revenue paid to copyright owner Both videos monetized in these territories: Guam, Guatemala, Peru, Guyana, Panama, Costa Rica, Colombia, Chile, French Guiana, Puerto Rico, Ecuador, Paraguay, United States, Canada, Palestine, Uruguay, Venezuela, U.S. Outlying Islands, Nicaragua, North Korea, Mexico, U.S. Virgin Islands, Bolivia, Honduras, Brazil, Northern Mariana Islands, American Samoa, Argentina, El Salvador, Belize, Suriname So remember people: Adblockers up to the maximum! Make it hard for these assclowns earn a single cent! - - - - Microsoft just sent out keys for the Halo 4 Test Flight to playtesters signed up to Halo: Waypoint. Never played Halo 4 myself, so this will be pretty cool. So far it runs well, though there are some tiny drops in framerate. But it's a test flight, so 343i might be able to fix that when it actually comes out. 00:00:00 - Intro & Setup - - - - 00:04:29 - "Requiem" 00:10:47 - Obligatory Warthog Section 00:12:30 - Hostiles 00:19:47 - Another Cartographer 00:21:52 - Reactivate 00:30:15 - To the Tower 00:35:12 - Banshee Action 00:37:40 - Ghosts & Turrets 00:44:30 - Sentinels & Hunters 00:46:43 - Towards the Terminus - - - - 00:48:27 - Thoughts & Outro Tags: Xusder,Sucks,Balls,Ass,Halo: The Master Chief Collection,PC,Test Flight,Halo 4,H4,Requiem
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.208 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".