MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7056805532

On globally optimizing a mining complex under supply uncertainty: Integrating components from deposits to transportation systems

2014· dissertation· en· W7056805532 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2014
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLaser Design and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsNewmont Corporation
KeywordsProduction (economics)Simulated annealingScheduleMining industryMillProduction schedule
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mining complexes are generally comprised of multiple deposits that contain several material types and grade elements, which are transformed in available processing destinations and transported to final stocks or ports as saleable products. These components, associated with a mining complex, encompass multiple sequential activities: (i) Mining the material from one or multiple sources; (ii) blending the material including stockpiling; (iii) transforming the material in different processing destinations considering operating modes; (iv) transporting the transformed material to final stocks or ports. Since these activities are strongly interrelated, their optimization must take place simultaneously. Conventional mining optimization methods suffer from at least one of the following drawbacks when optimizing mining complexes: some decisions are assumed when they should be dynamic (operating modes, destination of mining blocks, etc.); component based objectives are imposed, which might not coincide with global objectives; many parameters are assumed to be known when they are uncertain. Past research works have demonstrated that geological uncertainty is the main cause of the inability of meeting production targets in mining projects. This thesis presents methods to optimize mining complexes that simultaneously consider different components and account for geological uncertainty. A multistage methodology that uses simulated annealing algorithm to generate risk-based production schedules in mining complexes with multiple processing destinations is presented and implemented in Escondida Norte (Chile) copper dataset. Its implementation using Escondida Norte dataset generates expected average deviations of less than 5% regarding mill and waste targets, whereas a mine production schedule generated conventionally over a single estimated model generates expected average deviations of 20 and 12% for mill and waste targets respectively. An iterative improvement algorithm that considers operating modes at different processing destinations is developed and applied to a copper complex. The objective function seeks for maximizing discounted profits along the different periods and scenarios (orebody simulations). The implementation of the method at a copper deposit allows reducing the expected average deviations from 9 to 0.2% regarding the capacity of the first process while increasing the expected NPV by 30% when compared with an initial solution generated conventionally. A method that uses simulated annealing at different decision levels (mining, processing and transportation) is described and tested in a multipit copper operation. The implementation of the method in a multipit copper operation permits the reduction of the expected average deviations from the capacities at two mills from 18-22% to 1-3% and the expected average deviation from the targets regarding two blending elements from 7-1.8% to 0.3-0.6% when compared to an initial solution generated conventionally. The expected NPV also improves by 5%. The previous method is extended to mining complexes that combine open pit and underground operations and it is tested in a gold complex in Nevada. The implementation of the method at Twin Creeks gold complex in Nevada shows improvements in meeting the metallurgical blending requirements while increasing the expected NPV by 14%. The formulations described in this thesis encompass a large number of integer variables given the discretization of the mineral deposits. To solve the problems, efficient optimization algorithms are implemented with significant improvements when compared with conventional deterministic approaches. These algorithms outperform conventional methods regarding expected NPV and meeting targets at the different components of the value chain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)→Same topicLaser Design and Applications→French-language works237,207→