MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7056806789

Estudi numèric d'un pal amb aparell tou per l'embarcació AC45

2024· other· ca· W7056806789 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUPCommons institutional repository (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya) · 2024
Typeother
Languageca
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsValue (mathematics)Quarter (Canadian coin)Economic production
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aquest treball es centra en l’estudi d’un pal per al catamarà ac45. Aquest estudi es realitza degut a les noves característiques i necessitats de l’embarcació ja que passa de tindre una ala rígida com en la seva època en la america’s cup a un aparell tou per navegar en llac. el treball està dividit en sis capítols on el primer ens introdueix el catamarà ac45 on es repassa la seva història i la seva actualitat. en el segon capítol es fa una breu introducció teòrica als camps de l’enginyeria naval en els que es centra el treball. en el tercer capítol es veu amb més profunditat el pal on coneixerem la seva estructura i la seva geometria generant el model 3d del mateix. en el quart capítol es defineixen les càrregues tant les generades per la tensió dels cables que el subjecten, dels diamants i creuetes com de les generades per les veles. Per tal de trobar aquestes càrregues produïdes per les veles es realitzen diferents anàlisi de cfd i estructurals. en el cinquè capítol es realitza l`anàlisi estructural del pal veient els diferents materials utilitzats i en el cas dels materials compostos el seu laminat. Per concloure el capítol s’analitzen els resultats obtinguts per extreure les conclusions que veurem en el sisè capítol.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.114

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0340.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUPCommons institutional repository (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya)→Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→