MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7056819359

Human Neural Stem Cells Reduce Hypoxia-Ischemic Neurological Impairment Through the Regulation of Inflammatory M1/M2 Microglias in Rats

2025· article· en· W7056819359 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsNickel Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeural stem cellImmunohistochemistryApoptosisNeurotrophinNeurotrophic factorsBrain-derived neurotrophic factor
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ya-Bing Ding,1,2,* Yuan Zhao,1– 3,* Bing-Yu Chen,1 Qian Wang,1 Zhao-Yan Wang,1 Zuo Luan,1,2 Bin Yi4 1Department of Pediatrics, The Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Pediatrics, The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of Neonatology, Children’s Hospital of Shanxi, Women Health Centre of Shanxi, Taiyuan, People’s Republic of China; 4Department of Pediatrics, Gansu Provincial Maternity and Child-Care Hospital, Lanzhou, People’s Republic of China*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Zuo Luan, Department of Peadiatric, The Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100048, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86-18600310270, Fax +86-1066958303, Email luanzuodoctor@126.com Bin Yi, Gansu Provincial Maternity and Child-care Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, 730000, People’s Republic of China, Email www.0931@163.comObjective: This study aims to investigate the therapeutic efficacy and migration of human neural stem cell (hNSC) therapy in a rat model of moderate to severe Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE).Methods: hNSCs were transplanted into the brain ventricle of HIE-induced rats. The levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), immunohistochemistry of M1 and M2 cells counts, as well as the apoptosis of hNSCs were conducted after 10 days transplantation. Furthermore, Hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining and neurological function was assessed at 12 weeks post-implantation.Results: After implantation, hNSCs survived for a duration of 12 weeks. After 10 days post-implantation, extensive migration of hNSCs was observed, with a higher concentration detected in the injured hemisphere of the brain. This study also noted an upregulation in the expression levels of VEGF and BDNF in rats treated with hNSCs (P < 0.05), along with a significant reduction in M1 microglia (P < 0.001), an increase in M2 microglia (P < 0.01), and a decrease in apoptotic cell numbers (P < 0.001). At 12 weeks post-implantation, approximately 30.68% ± 4.30% of hNSCs differentiated into mature neurons, while 23.50% ± 3.60% differentiated into oligodendrocytes and 14.00% ± 1.03% differentiated into astrocytes respectively. Compared to Sham-operated rats, histological examination revealed reduced brain injury following hNSC therapy (P < 0.05). Additionally, neurobehavioral assessments demonstrated significant cognitive function recovery through Morris water maze test as well as increased frequency of left forelimb usage during Cylinder test and improved movement coordination exhibited by enhanced claw performance using Catwalk test (All P < 0.05).Conclusion: hNSCs exerted beneficial effects on brain damage recovery and apoptosis suppression via paracrine actions of VEGF and BDNF, M1/M2 microglial balance regulation, cell differentiation promotion. The study underlined the potential of hNSC implantation as a prospective neonatal HIE treatment strategy.Keywords: hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, neural stem cell, VEGF, BDNF, migration

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.125
GPT teacher head0.483
Teacher spread0.359 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)→Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→