MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7056840490

Genome-wide identification of target genes to vitamin D and analysis of the molecular mechanisms underlying its therapeutic properties

2007· dissertation· en· W7056840490 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2007
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcGill University Health CentreCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCancer Research SocietyGenome CanadaMcGill University
KeywordsGeneCalcitriol receptorRetinoic acidTranscription factorResponse elementTranscription (linguistics)PromoterRegulatorTranscriptional regulation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25D3), also know as cholecalciferol, is still best known as a regulator of calcium homeostasis. However more recent studies have revealed the pleiotropic actions of 1,25D 3, including immune and nervous system modulation, and cellular proliferation and differentiation. Epidemiological and model studies have revealed the anticancer properties of 1,25D3, which modulates gene transcription through the nuclear vitamin D receptor (VDR). This dissertation is composed of four different studies that focus on the molecular and genetic events that underlie the anticancer properties of 1,25D3. Our first set of experiments was a genome-wide exploration of cognate 1,25D3 response elements (VDREs), described as direct or everted repeats of PuG(G/T)TCA motifs separated by 3 or 6 bp at the promoters of 1,25D3 target genes that are recognized by the VDR. Our study identified over 3000 conserved VDREs and 158 human elements regulated in oral cancer cells. Expanding on this study, we then provided both molecular and genomic evidence that 1,25D3 and retinoic acid, another cancer preventive agent, can signal through a newly characterized common response element. This response element is an everted repeat of the consensus PuG(G/T)TCA motif separated by 8 bp (ER8). We characterized the ER8 element on the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p19ink4d gene and provided evidence that induction of this gene through the ER8 element by either ligand mediates cell cycle arrest and prevents autophagy by 1,25D3. Furthermore, well-differentiated squamous carcinoma cells (SCC) are sensitive to 1,25D3, whereas poorly differentiated SCC cells are partially resistant. This brought about the investigation of the effects of 1,25D3 combined with histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor TSA on 1,25D3-resistant SCC4 oral cancer cells. We found that SCC4 cells were highly sensitive to this combination, which induced G 2/M arrest and mitotic catastrophe. Finally, since single compound therapy is more advantageous from the pharmacotherapeutic point of view than multiple compound therapy, we created triciferol, a hybrid molecule which combines 1,25D3 agonism and HDAC inhibition. Triciferol behaves like both 1,25D3 and TSA as it activates 1,25D3 target genes with similar potency to 1,25D3, acetylates histones and induces G 2/M arrest and both mitotic catastrophe and autophagy in cancer cells. The work presented in this dissertation contains multiple original contributions to the 1,25D3 field as it provides: (i) insights on the direct target genes underlying the physiological actions of 1,25D3; (ii) evidence for cross-talk between 1,25D3 and RA, while uncovering the role of p194D in cell survival; (iii) support for the notion of 1,25D 3 insufficiency in the population may reduce the efficacy of HDACi chemotherapy; and a demonstration of the feasibility of combining HDAC inhibition with VDR agonism in 1,25D3 analogues to enhance their therapeutic potential.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)→Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→