How can new strategies foster the air cargo sector in the Lisbon airport, while dealing with the limited capacity and inadequacy of the air cargo infrastructures?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Air cargo in Portugal, despite its undeniable importance for the Portuguese economy, is still seen by some agents as a poor relative of passenger transportation, as a by-product, not as a product that, per se has tremendous potential for wealth generation. It is of fundamental importance, that the Lisbon airport and all its stakeholders are aware of this reality, under the risk of losing an important lever of economic growth, and this research is expected to contribute to this intent. Within this setting, this thesis aims to improve the operational performance within the airfreight sector in Lisbon, proposing new strategies to increase efficiency, while dealing with the limited capacity and inadequacy of the current air cargo infrastructures. By initially characterizing the sector, and subsequently identifying the main causes for the problem of limited capacity, a direct comparison can be made with the reality of some key industry European airports. Hence, allowing the finding of solutions for solving the identified causes to the main problem, and thereby uncovering the winning strategies to face possible constraints to a greater vitality of the air cargo sector in Lisbon.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".