Guest Editorial for the Special Section on Advances in Renewable Energy Forecasting:Predictability, Business Models and Applications in the Power Industry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The papers in this special section focus on advances in renewable energy forecasting, predictability, business models, and applications in the power industry. During the last 25 years, research has been conducted for developing renewable energy source (RES) forecasting algorithms, especially for wind and solar energy, seeking an improvement of predictability and uncertainty forecasting products. Research on wave energy forecasting is also being conducted, although this technology is not at the same maturity levels of wind and solar energy technologies. Furthermore, the number of companies selling forecasting services has proliferated and the reliability and availability of the services have improved. Currently, power system operators and electrical energy traders use weather and power forecasts embedded in their decision-making processes. Despite all this research and adoption by the energy industry, deterministic forecasts are still predominant in utility practice mainly due to: i) lack of understanding and standardization of uncertainty forecast products; and ii) high computational time associated with stochastic and robust optimization approaches. Moreover, proven business cases are also needed to demonstrate the benefits of uncertainty forecasts to end-users.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.021 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.011 | 0.018 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".