Grand trunk railway. Letter of Mr. Brassey to the Hon. John Ross, president of the company.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SIR,-The circumstances in which, on our arrival in this Country, we find the Grand Trunk Railway Company, and the very important results that must flow from the decision to be arrived at by the Public and the Government in regard to this undertaking within the next few weeks, war- rant us in addressing to you, for the purpose of publicity, certain statements bearing upon our first connection with Canada, and upon our present position and responsibilities implied and expressed towards the Province, and to the Company over which you preside.We do not desire to occupy your attention with any unnecessary recital of tacts -but in support of our own position, and as evidence of our uniform and unwavering efforts to fulfil our engagements, we must briefly sketch out the circumstances which led to our connection with this Province.In the Spring of 1852, when the Hon.Mr. Hincks was in London on a mission connected with the proposed International Railway from Quebec to Halifax, our firm was in communication with the Directors of the Quebec and Richmond Railway.Mr. Hincks was thus brought into contact with us, and subsequently when that gentleman believed that no adequate support was to be given to the proposed national work by the Imperial Government, he sought our aid with the view of undertaking those works of internal communication in Canada, required, in his opinion, to develope the growing
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.099 | 0.041 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".