HUBUNGAN ANTARA FAKTOR - FAKTOR DALAM CALGARY FAMILY ASSESSMENT MODEL DENGAN PERILAKU HIDUP BERSIH DAN SEHAT TENTANG "FOOD BORNE DISEASE" PADA ANAK SEKOLAH DI SEKOLAH DASAR NEGERI BABAT JERAWAT I KECAMATAN PAKAL SURABAYA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Incidence of food borne disease, such as diarrhea, typhoid and hookworm infection in school children were still sufficient susceptible. Lack of clean and healthy behavior became primary cause, so that the agent can easily enter to the body through the food consumed. One of the factors that influence the formation of children's behavior to keep hygiene and health related food borne disease prevention was family involvement. However, no studies that answer the question how the family was able to make children aware behave clean and healthy living. The purpose of this study was to analyze the correlation between family's factors in Calgary Family Assessment Model (CFAM) with clean and healthy behaviors by school children at Elementary School Babat Jerawat I, District Pakal Surabaya. This study was a cross sectional study. The sample of this study were 67 of fifth grade students at Elementary school Babat Jerawat I District Pakal Surabaya and their families, selected by purposive sampling of 121 students and their families who met the inclusion criteria. Data of clean and healthy behavior were collected by observation and interviews focused on a group of school children using questionnaires, checklists and interview guides. While data of family factors obtained through interviews with relatives (parents) of school children using Calgary Family Assessment Model (CFAM) fonnat. Data analysis was done by using the Spearman rank test. The results showed that the clean and healthy behavior about food borne disease, the majority of school children in Elementary school Babat Jerawat I District Pakal Surabaya included in good criteria (59.7%) and small portion of these included less category (40.3%). Preview of family's factors, such as structural, attachment (bonding) and functional's factors on Calgary Family Assessment Model, generally mostly included in good criteria, respectively are 68.7%, 71.6%, and 55.2%. There was variation in the results between family's factors based on a group of school children with well and less in clean and healthy behavior. However, there was no significant difference between family factors in both groups. The analysis results by Spearman rank test showed no significant correlation between family's factors in Calgary Family Assessment Model with clean and healthy behaviors by school children at Elementary school Babat Jerawat I District Pakal Surabaya (p = 0.430 or p> 0.05). However, there are several sub-variables of family's factors that had a significant correlation with clean and healthy behaviors by school children, among others: rank order (p = 0.038), parent's income (p = 0.006) and parent's home ownership status (p = 0.025). In addition, the trend showed that the larger an allowance given to the children, the quality of clean and healthy behavior would the lower. Based on these results, required empower families, to restrict or control the giving of school pocket money, so it was not used for snack at random that was less hygienic. Moreover, increase in family involvement in shaping habits of clean and healthy behavior children, as well as cooperation with the school, and local health officials to tighten rules snack vending management around the school as well as to educate the sustainability both within the school and the child's school community.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".