MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7057022159

Geodynamische und Paleo-Bathymetrische Rekonstruktion zwischen Kanada und Grönland

2013· dissertation· en· W7057022159 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMedia (https://www.suub.uni-bremen.de/) · 2013
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPulsed Power Technology Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBayBathymetryOceanic crustPlate tectonicsSedimentary basinCretaceousTectonicsMagnetic anomalyContinental shelfSedimentary rock
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Baffin Bay and the Labrador Sea are sedimentary basins of Cretaceous to Eocene age, located between Canada and Greenland. They are separated by the bathymetric high of Davis Strait which - as a polar gateway limits the water transport between both. While oceanic crust has long been identified from magnetic spreading anomalies in the Labrador Sea, the crust of Baffin Bay and Davis Strait remained a subject of debate. To analyse the tectonic evolution of the area, research expeditions in 2008 and 2010 collected geophysical data. I here present P-wave velocity and density models along a 710-km-long line in southern Baffin Bay and a 315-km-long line across the Davis Strait. Seismic reflection and magnetic anomaly data support and compliment the models. Previous studies are confirmed: Baffin Bay is floored by oceanic crust, the Davis Strait by stretched continental crust. By plate kinematic modelling I developed the tectonic evolution of southern Baffin Bay and the Davis Strait area. I further present a palaeobathymetric reconstruction of the Davis Strait as polar gateway.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.487
Threshold uncertainty score0.979

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedia (https://www.suub.uni-bremen.de/)Same topicPulsed Power Technology ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207