MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7057106690

The Influence of some embedding properties of subgroups on the structure of a finite group

2019· other· en· W7057106690 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenMETU (Middle East Technical University) · 2019
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComplement (music)Group (periodic table)Order (exchange)Term (time)Generalization
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a finite group $G$, a subgroup $H$ is called a $TI$-subgroup if $H$ intersects trivially with distinct conjugates of itself. Suppose that $H$ is a Hall $pi$-subgroup of $G$ which is also a $TI$-subgroup. A famous theorem of Frobenius states that $G$ has a normal $pi$-complement whenever $H$ is self normalizing. In this case, $H$ is called a Frobenius complement and $G$ is said to be a Frobenius group. A first main result in this thesis is the following generalization of Frobenius' Theorem. textbf{Theorem.}textit{ Let $H$ be a $TI$-subgroup of $G$ which is also a Hall subgroup of $N_G(H)$. Then $H$ has a normal complement in $N_G(H)$ if and only if $H$ has a normal complement in $G$. Moreover, if $H$ is nonnormal in $G$ and $H$ has a normal complement in $N_G(H)$ then $H$ is a Frobenius complement.} In the above configuration, the group $G$ need not be a Frobenius group, but the second part of the theorem guarantees the existence of a Frobenius group into which $H$ can be embedded as a Frobenius complement. Another contribution of this thesis is the following theorem, which extends a result of Gow (see Theorem ref{int gow}) to $pi$-separable groups. This result shows that the structure of a $pi$-separable group admitting a Hall $pi$-subgroup which is also a $TI$-subgroup is very restricted. textbf{Theorem.}textit{ Let $H$ be a nonnormal $TI$-subgroup of the $pi$-separable group $G$ where $pi$ is the set of primes dividing the order of $H$. Further assume that $H$ is a Hall subgroup of $N_G(H)$. Then the following hold:} textit{$a)$ $G$ has $pi$-length $1$ where $G=O_{pi'}(G)N_G(H)$;} textit{$b)$ there is an $H$-invariant section of $G$ on which the action of $H$ is Frobenius. This section can be chosen as a chief factor of $G$ whenever $O_{pi'}(G)$ is solvable;} textit{$c)$ $G$ is solvable if and only if $O_{pi'}(G)$ is solvable and $H$ does not involve a subgroup isomorphic to $SL(2,5)$.} In the last chapter we focus on giving alternative proofs without character theory for the following two solvability theorems due to Isaacs (cite{isa3}, Theorem 1 and Theorem 2). Our proofs depend on transfer theory and graph theory. textbf{Theorem.} textit{Let $G$ be a finite group having a cyclic Sylow $p$-subgroup. Assume that every $p'$-subgroup of $G$ is abelian. Then $G$ is either $p$-nilpotent or $p$-closed.} textbf{Theorem.} textit{Let G be a finite group and let $pneq 2$ and $q$ be primes dividing $

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.961
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenMETU (Middle East Technical University)Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207