Improving shelf-life of bison steaks treated with oregano and rosemary extracts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effects of plant extracts (non-enhanced, 0.05 % rosemary and 0.08% oregano extracts in the final product at a 10% pump level) on shelf life traits and consumer acceptability of bison striploin steaks were studied. Oregano steaks presented lower oxygen consumption and higher metmyoglobin reducing activity (MRA), decreased lipid oxidation and provided a stable red colour with less discolouration during the retail display period than the control and rosemary steaks (P < 0.05). Consumers indicated that treated steaks under study were not significantly different to the control group (P > 0.05) on palatability attributes and acceptability. However, rosemary injected steaks were more desirable and palatable than oregano counterpart (P < 0.05). In conclusion, plant extracts, particularly oregano, can considerably improve colour stability of bison steaks due to its antioxidants properties and ability to increase MRA capacity in the bison meat without posing any negative impact on its sensory attributes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".